(VP of Eng here) I filled out their sales form last year and never heard from them. We're currently spending $900k/year on AWS, and they didn't even acknowledge my request. crazy stuff.
Sayrus 51 minutes ago [-]
We had the opposite experience. We contacted them through their form this year and they were happy to discuss with us even when we communicated from the beginning we wouldn't be customer in the short to medium term and even for single rack systems.
MichaelZuo 28 minutes ago [-]
How did that compare to the big firms? HPE, Dell, and so on.
esseph 28 minutes ago [-]
You don't go to oxide for lowest cost.
jiveturkey 4 seconds ago [-]
I think the idea is that, in fact, you do.
Not one-time cost, but rather TCO.
ahl 1 hours ago [-]
Hit me up @oxidecomputer.com
ellieh 55 minutes ago [-]
tbf they are probably looking for customers with cloud spend ending in 'm'
Alien1Being 1 hours ago [-]
Logical.
They probably will be aquihired by someone like Broadcom.
TimTheTinker 13 minutes ago [-]
I can't think of an outcome that would be more odious to Steve Tuck and Brian Cantrill. Brian in particular still talks about the soul-crushing experience of Oracle's hostile takeover of Sun Microsystems.
boomskats 42 minutes ago [-]
I expect the majority of Oxide's customers are actively trying to escape Broadcom's VMWare hell. Can't see how something like that would make sense.
a2ff6eeb0 25 minutes ago [-]
It makes sense for Broadcom to remove that avenue of escape, and it makes sense for Oxide's investors to charge a premium to Broadcom, and materialize their returns.
The customers will have to deal with it, of course. At least they bought physical systems instead of renting them, so they can use them until they're obsolete.
MisterTea 40 minutes ago [-]
Makes sense for Broadcom.
dkbrk 17 minutes ago [-]
I doubt that. Oxide was founded by a bunch of ex-Sun people who have already been burned by the Oracle acquisition. If you read through what they say, their company values, and how they act, it's pretty clear their intent is to grow a sustainable long-term business and they're not looking for an exit.
api 43 minutes ago [-]
Say you are spending $1M. Round up. Or even 0.9M. Their sales might only return inquiries with cloud costs ending in M.
elzbardico 57 minutes ago [-]
If your CIO is not ideologically averse on paying people instead of paying jeff bezos, you can save money even buying dell.
api 42 minutes ago [-]
You are 100% correct but you’d be shocked at the mortal terror that “self hosting” inflicts in the minds of even people who should really know better.
Also forget Dell. Check out DataPacket.com and other metal hosters. You don’t need to physically rack unless you are huge or have special hardware or security needs.
The cloud industry has done an incredible job at a kind of soft pervasive propaganda that running stuff is “hard.”
antonvs 17 minutes ago [-]
You’re expressing a very narrow engineer’s perspective that doesn’t consider the realities of managing bare metal hosting at any kind of scale.
These are business decisions, made in terms of core competencies, capex vs. opex, and the difficulties and cost of building out a reliable, sustainable hosting operation that handles all the compliance and security requirements, and the full range of “ilities” that real businesses have to deal with.
The fact that Bob in IT might be capable of doing some of this on his own doesn’t really enter into the picture. It’s not relevant.
There’s a reason that most companies don’t operate their own electricity generation systems. Much the same is true for computing systems.
icedchai 10 minutes ago [-]
There are also many shades of gray between "big cloud" AWS/Azure/GCP and "my own rack" bare metal hosting.
LennyWhiteJr 60 minutes ago [-]
I will implicitly trust anything Jessie Frazelle works on. Rare combination of taste, skill, and passion.
Aurornis 20 minutes ago [-]
She stepped down several years ago.
She was still listed as an advisor in some capacity, but she moved on to a different startup.
22 minutes ago [-]
sscarduzio 48 minutes ago [-]
yep, another fan here!
fishgoesblub 2 hours ago [-]
I've seen posts about Oxide for years now, but do they actually ship hardware? I've never seen images, or posts about companies with their new Oxide Thingamajig™
ahl 1 hours ago [-]
We've shipped kind of a lot of hardware at this point!
It seems like Jane street and lawrence national laboratory are two confirmed customers.
fishgoesblub 2 hours ago [-]
With those two names it makes more since that I haven't seen anything regarding their use. Not exactly Joe Schmoe LLC as customers.
mihaelm 1 hours ago [-]
Joe Schmoe LLC will probably do just fine by sticking to popular clouds. I reckon adopting Oxide Computer would pay off at much larger volumes of traffic, or if you have to do on-prem due to regulatory reasons.
It would be nice to know more about pricing so the Enthusiast Joe can have a better idea, but it's more a boutique vibe right now.
esseph 27 minutes ago [-]
Most of their customers wouldn't be the type to let others know.
bkolobara 53 minutes ago [-]
They just raised $200M in February and $100M a year ago.
2023: Series A 44 Million https://oxide.computer/blog/oxide-unveils-the-worlds-first-c...
2025: Series B 100 Million https://oxide.computer/blog/our-100m-series-b
2026: Series C 200 Million https://oxide.computer/blog/our-200m-series-c
2026: Series D 445 Million https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1795071/000179507126...
Not one-time cost, but rather TCO.
They probably will be aquihired by someone like Broadcom.
The customers will have to deal with it, of course. At least they bought physical systems instead of renting them, so they can use them until they're obsolete.
Also forget Dell. Check out DataPacket.com and other metal hosters. You don’t need to physically rack unless you are huge or have special hardware or security needs.
The cloud industry has done an incredible job at a kind of soft pervasive propaganda that running stuff is “hard.”
These are business decisions, made in terms of core competencies, capex vs. opex, and the difficulties and cost of building out a reliable, sustainable hosting operation that handles all the compliance and security requirements, and the full range of “ilities” that real businesses have to deal with.
The fact that Bob in IT might be capable of doing some of this on his own doesn’t really enter into the picture. It’s not relevant.
There’s a reason that most companies don’t operate their own electricity generation systems. Much the same is true for computing systems.
She was still listed as an advisor in some capacity, but she moved on to a different startup.
* https://twitter.com/tobi/status/1793798092212367669
It seems like Jane street and lawrence national laboratory are two confirmed customers.
It would be nice to know more about pricing so the Enthusiast Joe can have a better idea, but it's more a boutique vibe right now.